<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title type="html">Remote Viewing</title>
  <subtitle>Practical guides on Remote Viewing, organized for fast browsing and comparison.</subtitle>
  <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/</id>
  <link rel="self" href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/feed.xml" type="application/atom+xml" />
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/" type="text/html" hreflang="en" />
  <updated>2026-10-11T18:41:46+00:00</updated>
  <author><name>Remote Viewing</name></author><entry>
    <title type="html">When Significant Numbers Still Fall Short</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/significance/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="When Significant Numbers Still Fall Short" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:49+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:49+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/significance/</id>
    <summary type="html">A significant result can flag an unusual pattern without proving that remote viewing caused it.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Why Lab Hits Did Not Become Intelligence</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/usefulness-de1206/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Why Lab Hits Did Not Become Intelligence" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:47+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:47+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/usefulness-de1206/</id>
    <summary type="html">The AIR evaluation separated laboratory scoring success from the much harder demand for useful intelligence.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Did Practice Make Remote Viewing Stronger?</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/viewers-7e0a9f/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Did Practice Make Remote Viewing Stronger?" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:47+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:47+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/viewers-7e0a9f/</id>
    <summary type="html">Utts highlighted stronger results from experienced viewers as one reason the database looked less random.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">When Vague Hits Look Too Good</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/over-matching/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="When Vague Hits Look Too Good" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:45+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:45+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/over-matching/</id>
    <summary type="html">Blind judging can still overstate success when vague impressions are matched too generously to a small set of possible targets.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Was the Target Really Hidden?</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/tasking-clues/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Was the Target Really Hidden?" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:44+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:44+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/tasking-clues/</id>
    <summary type="html">Tasking details can reveal whether a viewer was truly blind or whether ordinary clues may have shaped the session.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">What a Session Transcript Really Shows</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/transcripts/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What a Session Transcript Really Shows" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:39+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:39+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/transcripts/</id>
    <summary type="html">A remote viewing transcript can prove a session was recorded, but not that its impressions were accurate, paranormal or useful.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Released Is Not the Same as Proven</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/declassification/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Released Is Not the Same as Proven" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:38+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:38+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/declassification/</id>
    <summary type="html">A released CIA file shows that a record existed in the archive, not that the agency accepted the claim inside it as true.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Why the AIR Review Still Matters</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/air-review-8864ce/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Why the AIR Review Still Matters" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:37+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:37+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/air-review-8864ce/</id>
    <summary type="html">The AIR review helps readers distinguish statistical findings, expert disagreement and operational usefulness in the Star Gate record.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">What Star Gate Changed About Remote Viewing</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/star-gate/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What Star Gate Changed About Remote Viewing" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:37+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:37+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/star-gate/</id>
    <summary type="html">Government remote-viewing records shaped the term, but they also show why the evidence remains contested.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">How Remote Viewing Tests Can Go Wrong</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/leakage-risks/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="How Remote Viewing Tests Can Go Wrong" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:36+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:36+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/leakage-risks/</id>
    <summary type="html">A monitor can help structure a session, but poor handling can accidentally cue the viewer and weaken the result.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">What Remote Viewers Actually Record</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/session-notes/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What Remote Viewers Actually Record" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:35+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:35+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/session-notes/</id>
    <summary type="html">Remote-viewing sessions usually produce sketches, textures, shapes, moods, and partial impressions rather than clear pictures.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">When Is It More Than Guessing?</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/blind-judging-569aa6/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="When Is It More Than Guessing?" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:35+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:35+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/blind-judging-569aa6/</id>
    <summary type="html">Blind judging is meant to show whether a recorded response fits the real target better than plausible decoys.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">The Journal Fight Over Cues</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/nature-debate/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The Journal Fight Over Cues" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:34+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:34+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/nature-debate/</id>
    <summary type="html">The remote-viewing dispute played out across Nature replies and rebuttals that kept returning to ordinary sensory cues.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Why Replication Changed the Argument</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/failed-duplication/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Why Replication Changed the Argument" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:33+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:33+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/failed-duplication/</id>
    <summary type="html">Their 1978 Nature letter mattered because it reported duplicate experiments that did not verify Targ and Puthoff&#39;s conclusions.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">What a Cleaner Test Would Require</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/better-controls/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What a Cleaner Test Would Require" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:32+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:32+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/better-controls/</id>
    <summary type="html">After the cueing dispute, stronger remote-viewing tests had to document random targets, cue-stripped transcripts, blind judging, and full reporting.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Were the Judges Really Blind?</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/blind-judging-4dedb3/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Were the Judges Really Blind?" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:32+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:32+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/blind-judging-4dedb3/</id>
    <summary type="html">The Marks and Kammann critique turned on whether judges were truly blind to session order, target history, and procedural hints.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">Could One Judge Make the Effect Look Real?</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/single-judge/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Could One Judge Make the Effect Look Real?" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:30+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:30+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/single-judge/</id>
    <summary type="html">The use of one embedded judge made it hard to know whether the matches would survive outside the original research culture.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">What Would Count as Real Replication?</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/replication-8e1e3f/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What Would Count as Real Replication?" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:30+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:30+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/replication-8e1e3f/</id>
    <summary type="html">For Hyman, real replication meant changing the lab, judges, targets, procedures, and viewer pool without losing the effect.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">When One Method Can Fool a Whole Program</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/monomethod-bias-d88f67/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="When One Method Can Fool a Whole Program" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:29+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:29+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/monomethod-bias-d88f67/</id>
    <summary type="html">Hyman worried that repeated success inside one tightly connected setup could reflect the method rather than the claimed ability.</summary>
  </entry><entry>
    <title type="html">The First Test Hyman Wanted Run Again</title>
    <link href="https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/rejudging/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The First Test Hyman Wanted Run Again" />
    <published>2026-07-03T08:43:28+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-07-03T08:43:28+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://remote-viewing.branchoria.com/rejudging/</id>
    <summary type="html">Hyman&#39;s most practical demand was simple: let outsiders rejudge the same materials blind and see whether the effect remains.</summary>
  </entry></feed>
