When Feedback Contaminates the Next Session

Introduction

Feedback is an essential part of most remote-viewing training because it allows participants to compare their descriptions with the actual target and refine future performance. However, the timing of that feedback is also one of the least appreciated sources of potential sensory leakage. If viewers, interviewers or judges learn the target too early, the information can influence later sessions, alter written records or shape expectations in ways that are difficult to separate from genuine performance. As a result, experimental protocols treat feedback not merely as a training tool but as a governance issue: deciding precisely when, how and to whom target information is revealed can determine whether a series of remote-viewing trials remains scientifically interpretable. Reviews of government-sponsored research consistently identify procedural controls, including careful handling of target information, as central to evaluating the credibility of reported results.[National Security Archive]nsarchive2.gwu.eduNational Security ArchiveAn Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and…March 13, 2015 — by MD Mumford · 1995 · Cited by 76 — Panel mem…Published: March 13, 2015

Why feedback is useful in training

Within remote-viewing practice, feedback serves a legitimate purpose. After completing a session, the viewer compares sketches, impressions and written descriptions with the hidden target. Advocates argue that this comparison helps distinguish impressions that consistently correspond with targets from imagination, analytical guessing or habitual errors. Many structured training methods therefore include systematic feedback as part of skill development.[Google Books]books.google.comBooks Remote Viewing Secrets: A HandbookJoseph McMoneagle learned remote viewing in the U.S. Army–he was Remote Viewer #001 in the Army's Stargate program…

Training goals, however, differ from experimental goals. A training exercise seeks learning, whereas a controlled experiment seeks to measure performance without ordinary information influencing subsequent observations. This distinction means that procedures appropriate for personal practice may not be suitable for research. A protocol that gives immediate target feedback after every session may accelerate learning, but it also creates opportunities for information acquired during one trial to affect the next if multiple sessions are linked together.

For this reason, many formal protocols postpone feedback until every response required for a particular experimental series has been recorded and securely stored. Associative Remote Viewing (ARV) protocols, for example, typically define feedback as a separate phase occurring only after judging or after the outcome being predicted is known, rather than during data collection.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netShowing the nine phases of a typical ARV protocolThis double-blind study utilised dreaming instead of remote viewing as a pre…

How comments leak into later trials

Feedback contamination is broader than simply showing a participant the target image too early. Information can pass between sessions through several ordinary mechanisms.

• Memory effects. Once viewers know a previous target, they may consciously or unconsciously compare later impressions with it, producing descriptions influenced by recent experience rather than the new target.
• Interviewer expectations. An interviewer who has seen earlier targets may unintentionally alter questioning, prompting or encouragement in later sessions.
• Transcript contamination. If viewers revise notes after seeing feedback, or mention previous targets in later transcripts, judges may gain chronological clues that help identify targets through ordinary inference.
• Discussion between participants. Informal conversations after feedback can spread information to other viewers who have not yet completed their own sessions.
• Target-pool learning. Repeated exposure to a limited collection of targets allows participants to become familiar with the kinds of images likely to appear, reducing the effectiveness of blinding over time.

These mechanisms do not require fraud. They arise from normal learning and memory, making them particularly difficult to detect after the fact.

Why contamination matters across sessions

The risk becomes greater when experiments involve repeated testing of the same viewers, judges and target pool. Every feedback event potentially increases familiarity with recurring themes, locations or image categories. Over many sessions, participants may develop expectations that subtly influence both reporting and judging.

This concern parallels earlier criticisms of sensory cueing in remote-viewing research. Marks and Kammann argued that apparently impressive results in some early Stanford Research Institute experiments could be explained by ordinary clues embedded in transcripts rather than paranormal perception. Although their best-known examples involved dates, references to previous sessions and transcript cues rather than formal feedback procedures, the underlying principle is the same: information from one trial must not help solve another. Later commentators extended this reasoning to other routes by which knowledge can accumulate across an experimental series.[ERIC+2SciSpace]files.eric.ed.govERICED 296 127 AUTHOR TITLE REPORT NO PUB DATEERICMarch 31, 2011 — by D Druckman · 1988 · Cited by 411 — Scientific Assessment of Remote Viewing. After the first remote viewing… Ma…Published: March 31, 2011

Government reviews reached similar procedural conclusions. The 1995 evaluation commissioned for the CIA emphasised that stronger studies increasingly adopted tighter controls over judging, blinding and experimental handling because subtle procedural weaknesses could otherwise affect interpretation of positive findings.[National Security Archive]nsarchive2.gwu.eduNational Security ArchiveAn Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and…March 13, 2015 — by MD Mumford · 1995 · Cited by 76 — Panel mem…Published: March 13, 2015

What clean feedback procedures require

A well-controlled remote-viewing experiment typically separates data collection from learning. Practical safeguards include:

• Delay target revelation until every participant has completed every required session in the experimental series.
• Freeze records before feedback so that transcripts, sketches and timestamps cannot be altered after the target becomes known.

These measures are intended to protect not only individual trials but also the independence of an entire sequence of sessions.

An ongoing methodological debate

Researchers and practitioners generally agree that feedback has educational value. The disagreement concerns how rapidly it should be delivered and whether learning itself changes what later sessions measure.

Supporters of remote viewing often regard feedback as necessary for improving performance and maintaining viewer engagement. Critics counter that rapid feedback can blur the distinction between genuine target perception and ordinary learning, particularly in repeated-measures experiments using the same personnel and target sets. Because memory, expectation and familiarity are well-established psychological influences, modern experimental design increasingly treats delayed, carefully controlled feedback as part of basic quality assurance rather than as an optional procedural detail.[National Security Archive+2ERIC]nsarchive2.gwu.eduNational Security ArchiveAn Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and…March 13, 2015 — by MD Mumford · 1995 · Cited by 76 — Panel mem…Published: March 13, 2015

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to When Feedback Contaminates the Next Session. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The Demon-Haunted World

By Carl Sagan

Highlights why rigorous controls matter in science.

See on Amazon

Book

The conscious universe

By Dean I. Radin, Radin

First published 1997. Subjects: Parapsychology, Case studies, Cas, Études de, Paranormale verschijnselen, Parapsychologie.

See on Amazon

Book

An introduction to parapsychology

By Harvey J. Irwin, Caroline A. Watt

First published 2007. Subjects: Textbooks, Parapsychology.

See on Amazon

Book

Parapsychology

By Etzel Cardeña, John Palmer et al.

First published 2015. Subjects: Parapsychology.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The Demon Haunted WorldThe conscious universeAn to parapsychology books

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Example eBay listing

Psychic Lemon Pin Badge

SearcheBay.co.uk: psychic pin

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Ouija Board & Pointer Pin Brooch Gothic Psychic Occult Witchcraft Alchemy Badge

SearcheBay.co.uk: psychic pin

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Psychic TV cross pin. Genesis Breyer P-Orridge. Throbbing Gristle

SearcheBay.co.uk: psychic pin

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Pokémon TCG Trading Card Game Organized Play League Psychic Energy Pin

SearcheBay.co.uk: psychic pin

Browse similar oneBay.co.uk

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf

2. Source: books.google.com
Title: Books Remote Viewing Secrets: A Handbook
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Remote_Viewing_Secrets.html?hl=id&id=Lj3nEAAAQBAJ

3. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Showing-the-nine-phases-of-a-typical-ARV-protocol_tbl1_344470071

4. Source: scispace.com
Title: information transmission in remote viewing experiments 4jd6pdendv
Link:https://scispace.com/pdf/information-transmission-in-remote-viewing-experiments-4jd6pdendv.pdf

5. Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00787R000200090017-5.pdf

6. Source: researchgate.net
Title: 374881423 Remote Viewing A 1974 2022 Systematic Review and [Meta Analysis]({{ ‘meta-analysis/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374881423_Remote_Viewing_A_1974-2022_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis

7. Source: researchgate.net
Title: 369604750 Remote Viewing a 1974 2022 systematic review and meta analysis
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369604750_Remote_Viewing_a_1974-2022_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis

8. Source: ia800403.us.archive.org
Link:https://ia800403.us.archive.org/25/items/CIA-RDP96-00787R000500400001-4/CIA-RDP96-00787R000500400001-4.pdf

9. Source: nsarchive2.gwu.edu
Link:https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB438/docs/doc_57.pdf

Published: March 13, 2015

10. Source: files.eric.ed.gov
Title: ERICED 296 127 AUTHOR TITLE REPORT NO PUB DATE
Link:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED296127.pdf

Published: March 31, 2011

11. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Remote viewing
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

12. Source: valegas.sedes.ma.gov.br
Title: feedback protocols for maximizing the potential of remote viewing research
Link:https://valegas.sedes.ma.gov.br/remote-viewing-target-pool/

Additional References

13. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/981560752/rv-beginners-guidebookV1

14. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/comments/1khx2k1/best_way_to_give_and_get_feedback_on_sessions/

15. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/comments/1846qvh/this_is_terrifying_i_just_tried_this_and_what_i/

16. Source: verevio.com
Link:https://verevio.com/remote-viewing

17. Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/remote-viewing-community-magazine/remote-viewing-definition-protocol-and-corollaries-dca159934230

18. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Smo1aP0v4xg

19. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/181s71r/the_cias_experiments_with_remote_viewing_and/

20. Source: youtube.com
Title: Remote Viewing Explained: How the Mind Sees Without Eyes
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whpZzUwrUNU

21. Source: academia.edu
Title: A minimal decline effect was noted,
Link:https://www.academia.edu/111635854/Remote_Viewing_a_1974_2022_systematic_review_and_meta_analysis

22. Source: reddit.com
Title: The greatest 15 minute
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/comments/gh27r7/the_greatest_15_minute_introduction_to_controlled/