Within CIA Myths
What the Uri Geller Files Leave Unsettled
The Uri Geller records preserve a controversy, not a settled verdict on psychic ability.
On this page
- What early SRI reports appeared to show
- Why sensory leakage and judging still mattered
- How selective retellings flatten the dispute
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The declassified records associated with Uri Geller are among the most frequently cited documents in discussions of remote viewing, yet they are also among the most selectively retold. The files do preserve an important historical episode: in 1973, researchers at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) reported experimental results that they believed justified further investigation into Geller’s claimed perceptual abilities. What the files do not provide is a settled scientific or institutional verdict that psychic functioning had been demonstrated.
That distinction matters because later criticism focused not on whether the experiments occurred—they unquestionably did—but on whether the experimental controls, judging procedures and opportunities for ordinary information transfer were sufficient to support the extraordinary conclusions that were drawn. Subsequent reviews by sceptics, together with the CIA-commissioned evaluation of the wider STAR GATE programme in the 1990s, show that the controversy remained unresolved rather than conclusively settled.[CIA]cia.govAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMUtts and Hyman were asked to prepare independent reports based on their review. In this rev…
What early SRI reports appeared to show
Uri Geller’s association with government-linked psychic research stems primarily from experiments conducted at Stanford Research Institute in August 1973 by Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ. Working under research funded through U.S. defence-related interests, they tested Geller’s claimed ability to reproduce drawings prepared in another location and to describe concealed targets under conditions intended to reduce normal sensory communication.
The resulting reports were unusually positive. Puthoff and Targ argued that Geller had demonstrated “information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding” sufficiently well to justify further scientific investigation. Their later paper in Nature became one of the most widely cited publications in the history of parapsychology and remains central to discussions of early remote-viewing research.[Wikipedia]WikipediaUri GellerUri Geller
These reports are genuine historical documents, and their existence explains why Geller appears repeatedly in declassified archives. However, the documents primarily record the researchers’ interpretation at that point in time. They do not represent a final consensus within either the scientific community or the U.S. intelligence community.
Why sensory leakage and judging still mattered
The dispute surrounding the Geller experiments did not centre simply on belief versus disbelief. Much of it concerned experimental design.
Critics argued that the reported successes could not be interpreted confidently because the studies left open possibilities for ordinary information transfer—known in parapsychology as sensory leakage. This term refers to unintended conventional cues reaching a participant through sight, sound, conversation, reflections, timing or other non-paranormal means.
Psychologist Ray Hyman, who later reviewed both the Geller work and broader remote-viewing research, argued that the original protocols were insufficiently rigorous to eliminate these possibilities. Other critics, including David Marks and Richard Kammann, examined aspects of the SRI procedures and argued that the experimental environment allowed opportunities for inadvertent cueing or information leakage that should have been excluded before extraordinary claims were accepted. They also questioned the methods used to match descriptions to targets, arguing that subjective interpretation could inflate apparent success.[Wikipedia+2Wikipedia]WikipediaUri GellerUri Geller
These criticisms did not necessarily claim that fraud had been demonstrated in every trial. Rather, they argued that the controls were not strong enough to distinguish paranormal perception from more ordinary explanations. In experimental science, that distinction is crucial: a positive result obtained under imperfect controls does not establish that the proposed phenomenon has been demonstrated.
The importance of judging procedures also became clearer over time. Remote-viewing descriptions are often broad, symbolic or ambiguous. If judges know contextual information or have considerable freedom in deciding which target best matches a description, unconscious confirmation bias can influence the outcome. Later researchers therefore placed greater emphasis on blind judging, stricter randomisation and independently replicated protocols.
How selective retellings flatten the dispute
Many online discussions present the Uri Geller files as though they contain a straightforward government endorsement of psychic ability. That impression usually results from quoting only the early SRI reports while omitting the decades of methodological criticism that followed.
A common pattern is to reproduce scans of declassified reports describing successful sessions without mentioning that:
- the reports reflected the views of the original investigators rather than a settled government conclusion;
- independent reviewers questioned whether the experimental controls adequately excluded conventional explanations;
- later evaluations of remote-viewing research continued to disagree over interpretation even when statistical anomalies were acknowledged.
The result is a simplified narrative in which “the CIA proved Geller was psychic”. The documentary record does not support that interpretation. The CIA archive preserves both enthusiastic early research and later critical assessment, not a single unambiguous institutional position.[CIA]cia.govAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMUtts and Hyman were asked to prepare independent reports based on their review. In this rev…
The later reviews changed the context
The broader STAR GATE evaluation commissioned in the mid-1990s illustrates why the Geller files cannot be read in isolation.
The American Institutes for Research asked statistician Jessica Utts and psychologist Ray Hyman to prepare independent assessments of the accumulated remote-viewing evidence. Their reports are notable because both agreed that some experiments produced results that deserved careful consideration, yet they differed sharply on what those findings meant.
Utts argued that the statistical evidence justified accepting the existence of anomalous cognition as a genuine phenomenon requiring further investigation. Hyman accepted that some later studies appeared stronger than earlier work but concluded that methodological uncertainties, insufficient independent replication and alternative explanations prevented such a conclusion. Their disagreement itself became part of the official review record.[CIA]cia.govAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMUtts and Hyman were asked to prepare independent reports based on their review. In this rev…
Importantly, the overall programme review did not recommend remote viewing as a reliable intelligence capability. The assessment concluded that the available evidence had not demonstrated operational usefulness for intelligence collection, even while recognising that some experimental findings remained scientifically interesting.[CIA]cia.govAN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMUtts and Hyman were asked to prepare independent reports based on their review. In this rev…
What the Uri Geller files actually leave unsettled
The lasting significance of the Geller records lies less in what they prove than in what they document.
They show that respected researchers conducted experiments they believed were sufficiently intriguing to merit publication and further study. They also show that those experiments became the focus of sustained methodological criticism from psychologists, sceptics and later reviewers who questioned whether the apparent successes survived more rigorous scrutiny.
For readers exploring remote-viewing history, the key lesson is that the archive records a controversy rather than its resolution. Early positive findings, later critiques of sensory leakage and judging, competing interpretations by reviewers and the eventual assessment of limited intelligence value all belong to the same historical record. Removing any one of those elements produces a simpler story—but not a more accurate one.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What the Uri Geller Files Leave Unsettled. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Truth about Uri Geller
Directly addresses the controversies surrounding Uri Geller.
The Men Who Stare At Goats
Rating: 3.5/5 from 11 Google Books ratings
Introduces the culture surrounding military paranormal projects.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf
Source snippet
AN EVALUATION OF THE REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAMUtts and Hyman were asked to prepare independent reports based on their review. In this rev...
2.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00791r000200180006-4
Source snippet
ew, they were to cover four general topics:? Was there a...Read more...
3.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Uri Geller
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uri_Geller
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Sensory leakage
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_leakage
5.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: [Stargate]({{ ‘stargate/’ | relative_url }}) Project (U.S. Army unit)
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_Project_%28U.S._Army_unit%29
Source snippet
Stargate Project (U.S. Army unit)Hyman had produced an unflattering report on Uri Geller and SRI for the government two decades earlie...
6.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Russell Targ
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_cLp15CaPE
Source snippet
Scientific and Spiritual Implications of Psychic Abilities - Russell Targ...
Additional References
7.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/historyoasis/posts/from-1972-to-1995-the-united-states-military-invested-over-20-million-in-one-of-/790173214116954/
Source snippet
From 1972 to 1995, the United States military invested over...Hyman had produced an unflattering report on Uri Geller and SRI for the go...
8.
Source: ucdavis.edu
Title: [psychic spying]({{ ‘psychic-spying/’ | relative_url }}) research produces credible evidence
Link:https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/psychic-spying-research-produces-credible-evidence
Source snippet
'Psychic Spying' Research Produces Credible Evidence28 Nov 1995 — Secret government experiments on "psychic spying" have produced the mos...
9.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/MissMayim/posts/renowned-us-army-remote-viewer-and-psychic-spy-angela-ford-reveals-her-incredibl/1328992651922216/
Source snippet
o decades earlier, but the psychologist David Marks...Read more...
10.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/AskImtinan/posts/project-stargate-the-cias-search-for-tabut-e-sakinahin-1972-the-cia-secretly-fun/1575907587435890/
Source snippet
rnment two decades earlier, but the psychologist David Marks found...
11.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10275521/
Source snippet
Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA...by Á Escolà‐Gascón · 2023 · Cited by 10 — CIA [declassification]({{ 'declassification/' | relative_url }}) Reports on the declassified SRI eval...
12.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Scientific and Spiritual Implications of Psychic Abilities
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgyYms376Mg
Source snippet
The Story of Uri Geller: CIA Psychic Warrior??...
13.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Inside The Military’s Secret Psychic Unit
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nY3hu76SyU
Source snippet
How the CIA worked with psychics on 'Project Stargate' | Reality Check with Ross Coulthart...
14.
Source: ics.uci.edu
Link:https://www.ics.uci.edu/~jutts/may.pdf
Source snippet
UC Irvine Bren Schoolresearch review of the departmentby C EDwIN · 1996 — at SRI with Uri Geller, an Israeli magician/psychic. CIA/AIR ev...
15.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH065Et-Uew
16.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3MsqnWtMWY
Source snippet
Inside The Military's Secret Psychic Unit...
Topic Tree